Editor invited after minor revision

Piano letter notes happy birthday

Minor Revision - The minor revision should not go back to the reviewers. The author is informed by the Editor directly, and will send the revision to the original Editor together with a short summary about the modifications authors have made and author's response to reviewer's comments. What does the status of my submission mean in EVISE? ... Editor Invited. ... The author has agreed to revise but has not completed the revision process yet. Revise – either major or minor (explain the revision that is required, and indicate to the editor whether you would be happy to review the revised article). If you are recommending a revision, you must furnish the author with a clear, sound explanation of why this is necessary.

Is peer review just a crapshoot? How do reviewer recommendations influence editor decisions? And are Chinese authors treated fairly? By Richard B. Primack, PhD, Ahimsa Campos Arceiz, PhD, and Lian Pin Koh, PhD Posted on 31 March 2015 After evaluation, the Academic Editor chooses between the following decisions: Accept Minor Revision Major Revision Reject Revisions - Authors who receive a decision of Minor Revision or Major Revision have 45 days to resubmit the revised manuscript. The Reviewer Scoresheet Recommendation Options. Ultimately, it is the editor who will decide whether to accept, reject, or ask for revisions on a manuscript. Therefore it is useful for the reviewers to make a recommendation. Accept and reject are self-explanatory, but revision recommendations may need clarifying. Most commonly:

Editor invited after minor revision submitted. According to editor guideline on springer website "Accept with minor revisions is actually a commitment to ultimately publish the paper, provided the authors answer the remaining concerns (which should be relatively minor) in a timely and proper way.". Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent back to the reviewers. If you intend for the reviewers to verify the revisions, you should NOT choose Minor Revision. Choose Major Revision if a paper has real potential, but a large component should ...

Minor Revision - The minor revision should not go back to the reviewers. The author is informed by the Editor directly, and will send the revision to the original Editor together with a short summary about the modifications authors have made and author's response to reviewer's comments. The SAE has four primary categories to choose from: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, and Reject. After making a preliminary decision and adding comments to the author, this is passed on to the coeditor (typically the one who began the process) for further review and occasional discussion before finalizing it to send to the author.

If the previous editorial decision was B, only the editor will see the author responses and will make a decision based on them. It should take at least a few weeks for rereview and the editor to make a decision after your revision (if the previous decision was B, then much less).

May 20, 2015 · Terry, If you check out the Editor’s Report for a journal to remain nameless (but rhymes with “Biotropica”) the numbers don’t necessarily agree with you. Scroll to Table 4 “Distribution of First Decisions”: Accept=0.6% Minor Revision=6% Major Revision=20.7% Reject/Resubmit=21.6% (Includes decisons made by EIC+SE not to send to referees)

Is peer review just a crapshoot? How do reviewer recommendations influence editor decisions? And are Chinese authors treated fairly? By Richard B. Primack, PhD, Ahimsa Campos Arceiz, PhD, and Lian Pin Koh, PhD Posted on 31 March 2015

For the 2093 papers sent out for review, reviewer recommendations strongly influenced the outcome of the review process. Reviewer recommendations of accept and minor revision were similar in their positive effects on editor decisions, while papers receiving at least one recommendation of reject (“the kiss of death”) were almost always rejected. From the author's perspective, the decision by the editor is the long-awaited final event in the peer review process. Although every author wants to have his or her work accepted for publication and to see it in print-on paper or digital, everybody realizes that acceptance is not possible every time.

Jan 21, 2011 · Hi, Hello, I submitted a paper April 2014 and the decision was moderate revision, i revised and resubmit, again i am asked to make minor revision, i did so and resubmit. now the status is Editor invited and the date of submission changed to current date???, what does this mean??? please. Reply ↓ Minor Revision - The minor revision should not go back to the reviewers. The author is informed by the Editor directly, and will send the revision to the original Editor together with a short summary about the modifications authors have made and author's response to reviewer's comments.

Minor revision: The manuscript could be published after minor revisions. Major revision: The manuscript might be published after major revision, but further review is necessary. Reject: The manuscript is not suitable for Journal of Applied Physics. After evaluation, the Academic Editor chooses between the following decisions: Accept Minor Revision Major Revision Reject Revisions - Authors who receive a decision of Minor Revision or Major Revision have 45 days to resubmit the revised manuscript.

  • Velocity and acceleration analysis of four bar mechanism

  • Meyeder rape sex x desi jore kore

  • 750 rms amp

  • Penn 3 0 senator

  • Shorkie puppies phoenix

  • 24 inch bike

      • Pipeline price per foot

      • Visa bulletin may 2020 predictions

      • Centos 7 ipv6 dhcp

      • 3ds code bin

      • Park model homes wears valley tn

      • Minecoin codes

Child protection officer cover letter

After 5 weeks of revision, we email the editor. She said that she had only one revision and she had asked more than eleven potential reviewers. The entire review process took very long time (11 weeks) and we received one bad revision and another consisting in two lines saying that our work was ok but already published somewhere but the reviewer ... From the Editor Responding to Reviews A t last, here it is! The long awaited email from the editor containing his or her decision about a manuscript that has been submitted for publication. What should one expect and how should one proceed after opening that email? Very rarely is a manuscript accepted outright or with only minimal changes ...

Solid epoxy resin msds

Jun 23, 2017 · Yes. When an editor sends a paper back for major revisions, it means they think it may be suitable for their journal after quite a lot more work. A paper resubmitted after major revisions will almost always be sent back out for review, after the e... Revise – either major or minor (explain the revision that is required, and indicate to the editor whether you would be happy to review the revised article). If you are recommending a revision, you must furnish the author with a clear, sound explanation of why this is necessary.

Computer stuttering windows 10 reddit

Minor Revision - The minor revision should not go back to the reviewers. The author is informed by the Editor directly, and will send the revision to the original Editor together with a short summary about the modifications authors have made and author's response to reviewer's comments.

Bdo fugitive khalk loot

A subject editor, who oversaw a manuscript, was invited by the authors to become a co-author after the first review round. After inviting the subject editor to become an author (and adding his name to the author list), the revised version of the paper was submitted to the journal. How to write a reviewer report 2 – Accept for publication without revision – Ask for minor revision for likely acceptance – Request major revision for another review process – Reject outright Responsibility of the reviewer The reviewer must provide to the editor an objective, expert opinion on whether the paper satisfies the Articles may or may not be sent to reviewers after author revision, dependent on whether the reviewer requested to see the revised version and the wishes of the Academic editor. Apart from in exceptional circumstances, we allow a maximum of two rounds of major revision per manuscript. The MDPI editorial process. Production Reviewing: Major Revision or Reject? Excerpts from a conversation in 2003. From a student: Sometime when you have a few cycles to spare, could you give me some advice on the difference between a revise-and-resubmit and an outright reject decision?
Visual boy advance

Mae fesai

Oct 20, 2016 · Even in circumstances where the revision time is generous, editors need to keep that due date in mind when making a decision. If the editor feels as though it would be difficult for an author to make the changes required in the amount of time given for revisions, then the editor should reject the paper. How to write a reviewer report 2 – Accept for publication without revision – Ask for minor revision for likely acceptance – Request major revision for another review process – Reject outright Responsibility of the reviewer The reviewer must provide to the editor an objective, expert opinion on whether the paper satisfies the If the editor feels that your manuscript has the potential to be published, but requires changes, you’ll be invited to revise it. You’ll have 45 days to resubmit the revised manuscript for both a major or a minor revision. In most cases, the revised manuscript is re-assigned to the original Academic Editor. Minor revision: The manuscript could be published after minor revisions. Major revision: The manuscript might be published after major revision, but further review is necessary. Reject: The manuscript is not suitable for Journal of Applied Physics. It will start only once the AE takes over. Generally, it does not take too long to assign an AE. It is clear from the status that the EiC has invited an editor, but the editor has not yet accepted the invitation. However, the status date changing today could mean that the editor has replied to the invitation. Submission – Revision letter example Address to the Editor/s Date: xx/xx/xxxx Dr. A. Surname Editor-in-Chief, Journal Street Address City, Postcode Country Dear Editor, Journal of Make-believe We would like to thank you for the letter dated xx/xx/xxxx, and the opportunity to resubmit a revised copy of this manuscript. Jan 21, 2011 · Hi, Hello, I submitted a paper April 2014 and the decision was moderate revision, i revised and resubmit, again i am asked to make minor revision, i did so and resubmit. now the status is Editor invited and the date of submission changed to current date???, what does this mean??? please. Reply ↓ It will start only once the AE takes over. Generally, it does not take too long to assign an AE. It is clear from the status that the EiC has invited an editor, but the editor has not yet accepted the invitation. However, the status date changing today could mean that the editor has replied to the invitation. The librarian imdb